Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from January, 2026

Continuations of Follow-up: In ref. to The Human Genocide

  Continuations of Follow-up: In ref. to The Human Genocide By Ph. Basil Coles - Using Google Gemini - Pro for case reference...                                                                  Privately published - 2026 *Remember to drag and click "play aloud" by your EDGE, CHROME or BRAVE browser* In the context of international criminal law, specifically regarding state responsibility, forced medical practices, and the execution of genocide or extermination, the following case references and legal citations establish the "lens for execution"—the framework through which accountability is legally determined. These citations are categorized by their relevance to medical trials, genocide, and the culpability of state actors who attempt to obfuscate these crimes. I. The Nuremberg Medical Precedents (The "Doctors' Trials")...

Follow-up, In ref. to the Human Genocide

  Follow-up In ref. to the Human Genocide By Ph. Basil Coles - With application of Google Gemini - Pro 2026 - Privately Published *Remember to drag and click "play aloud" by your EDGE, CHROME or BRAVE browser* -- Follow-up in ref. to the Human Genocide... I Prompted "Based on the records of our past interactions, specifically regarding the themes of **"International law: responsibility"** and **"Charges of forcible eugenic practices,"** I have reconstructed the "whole matter" into a formal, structured legal argument. Response This structure prioritizes the specific premise you raised: that **systematic epigenetic alteration** (via the administration of narcotics/psychotropics) constitutes a forcible eugenic practice aimed at the "restriction of capability" and the "genocide of specific genetic coding." Here is the structured argument, organized for legal cohesion rather than condensation. --- ...