Sexuality – In Litigation of Personhood
By Ph. Basil Coles - 2024
This in an unfinished work and will be updated in perpetuity
Perception and Adaptation
The interpretations behind sexuality have been sold as if the stimulation of the nervous system are inherently a property related to the inclination of instinct. While the development of one entering into adulthood may be fraught with experiences that incline an other to say they have pursued something, the testing and ritual nature of behaviours involving the perpetuation of a bodily function and the ends to which allow that function to operate autonomically are variable a measure that come into play with the balance between the objective practicing of that form of stimulation, while also allowing one to be layed upon in the judgement of that act – Relatively the method by which the “string was pulled” holds a dual notion; As the malignancy is partial on both the ends of pursuit and whom “dangles the carrot” ..
Practices of sexuality have been relayed through the ages as both a natural pleasure of being born, but furthermore an integrated perception functional between two individuals that can allow through specified selection, the better growth and development of a species. Where to not require criteria is fundamentally an unsound and dangerous interpretation of the focus between where the intrapersonal skill of the acto/ress allows the socialization to set a scene, but the broader set of adaptations such as attractiveness, health, genetic properties and signatures of inbreeding are effectively partisan to the further integration of traits in a better funded world as far as evolutionary capacity goes…
Food scarcity was considered an adaptation towards the sexual imposition of partners as the providing of food was represented by the distinguishments of their figure, not to say the degrading qualities of obesity are not concerning as far as genetic traits are related – The sexual selection is partial to cultural normatives in only so far as the normative are observed. With the temperament of one whom performs effectively in social environments, the indications for healthy social patterns allow for children that may not become stressed due to the inability to communicate, their development not stunted by overloads of cortisol and the properties that distinguish a child’s later years and the culture they participate in not as far determined by the irrationality of one decision to pursue warmth. Both the physical traits, the personification of those acto/resses and the environment are factors into the ability to propagate sexual context in the socialized discourse.
The neurological functions are correlative to the mnemonics of stimulation, as sexuality itself is not an objective or (true) property, functioning as a factoral medium to entice and guide both psycho-sexual interpretations in the individual and leave an effective marker on the example by which others can make an example of others for dysfunctional and dangerous practices. The tendencies by one group or the individual. Not unlike ducks under the rare conditions of separation or seclusion, lacking the objectivity of context to the base interlocuting of an other. The rationality of practice is a matter of both capacity and opportunity. Thus, the bias to in such cases as the body provides a stimulation from touch (or) the mnemonics of prior experiences create a bridge in the gaps between a need and a want. Where the duck has only the capacity to engage in social sexuality in the excess of organic matter build up – The release entirely optional to that which has not been hindered in the wants or direction by homo sapien, sapiens *Sapientii*
The Mechanism
There are multiple aspects to the body that allow you to interpret sexuality. Some are driven by the autonomic nervous system, others are manually operated and then one lesser acknowledged is the framework that allows you to exist. You exist in 3 dimensions. The “you”-ness founded in the first dimension, the encapsulation of you being in the second, being the spirit – Your body in the world operated through the first two and the ends of which result in your propensity with the framework if the totality of the first dimension. The concepts behind instinct are in relation to moderated practices of other id’s, separately designated to push or pull (as enticement) for the only way to be as creatures with a capacity to be drawn towards procreation. While there are aspects of the life you live that you can control and moderate, the framework was literally built on the warping and designation of others such as you, created before you to pallet the “appetite” for actions entirely inherent to creatures. Instinct as a whole is an evidentiary concept to there being designated faculty moderators, I moderate them, they moderate you…
—
These variations between the simply conscious matter of socialized interpretation that is internalized and the “external” (also in the internal framework) conveys things such as the ability to walk with animals like deer, for fish to breath and swim and so fourth as simple conventions in “semi-autonomics” designated in then creation of the world. Sexuality being as itself a method for continued imbueing of genetic property .. This determinstic aspect is the one thing left uncalculated for in the modernization of sexual practices. Saying that if I created the matter at hand entirely without separately operated logic gates by those designated faculty .. You would all have hermaphroditic bodies, that would be deeper related to a Cambrian phylogenetic representation.
This expectation in the interim of the interactive properties balancing what defines a convention alteriorly to the fundamental make-up of your ability to exist. This combination is defining property of world in the negotiation between phalligocentricization and the base nature of the world being feminine. As the creation factor is is always in operation to – through an other – As such, the matter of life imperically being feminine in the woam and then masculinating on the supposition of genetic predisposition.
The Practice
The properties that permit the functions as all materials of equation operate off of a numeric quality of hygienic property, this being any act moderated by both the permissions to exist and then a supplemental return as to which the bias of the act is objectively clean or unclean. Sexuality being in itself a supplemental property to the creation of the world, thus is inherently equated by a deeper examination of every interaction. Evaluation to environmental factors and social convention lay not exclusions, but derivative roots which seed a lack of hygiene in association by association.
Urges are socialized as manifestations of the identity, while false positives and unconsidered factors in denial as the sexual relation to others is always to (the other) in contribution, to an act. While absent of the literation to which understanding a property is attributed; Financial and social convenience are whittled away by quantified matters of permitted perspective for this reason, men do not stand in forests and pretend to be trees, which women come to sap – Men are not trees, and women are not solely interlocutors.
For this reason, interpretations on sexuality lack a property of an others subjective distinction. Breaking the moral aptitude of recycled people from harms way to attribute the dysfunction as a socialized premise is not clean, as the acts which many aim to promote with objectification of a sexual practice. The degradation of expectations and quotients of effective property not making the ends meet are effectively regardless of opinion, a subset of punishable behavior.
In short the variation in geometry and reasonable conventions to the personal experience in combination are left with subsiding instinctive properties that engage the senses to create or decline reason based in the health of that partner, while others in social media, through personal sexual "interaction" masturbation create false positives that lead to artificial inclinations involving unhealthy or dangerous partners based on that culturing in male subjects.
I.e observation of traits in parts though in due to inexperience, openness to pursue what appeared to be pleasurable was differing in practice than .. (face it, generally a guy with 2 magazines of .40 hollowpoints in shouting distance) As the capacity to make socialization in part to the unhealth of environments such as Canada, used as a Christian dumping ground for whores (moral negotiators, idolators) nazis and other criminals representing the harms of Christianity.
Further institutionalizing the malicious presentation of ignorant actions subversive to reason and blindly defended by fantastical nicity. The two truly intermingled in relation to iconoclasm and iconography. The balances between the modernist and real perspectives do vary when an idle mind is left to play with... situationally, sexual practices are of a mystery to the conventional mind. You in case have no true pertinence to sexuality. You apply is as you apply food, some may try to supplement one for the other or in other cases, (that other thing) for both...
Though variation in supplemental application are in turn broadly relevant to both exposure, the socialization of a subject and a target demographic being met consistently; determinal a causal trajectory for personally identifying with an objective.
Obscurity of personally identifying traits or diminished conformity create an underappreciation of characteristics that imply suitable partnership in courting in the stead of headstrong bonding in some conformity to objective parallels. The ideation of touch being the only is not true, but the visual stimulation being... is also not true. It is an effort involving energy and actionable means that when combined with intimacy allow for the sensation to be healthy with all aforementioned traits that do not blacken.
--
Effectively, it is a culture of healthy sexuality that both fostered and harnessed by both each individual and their chance encountered parties; That allows for social conventions which slowly diminish representation of groups that go unmarked, such as fetishists, deviants and others that do in their specific moral have secular convention inwards towards themselves - with diminishing qualities that effect intermittently but in incidents frequent enough for big data statistical analysis; Which allows for what people imply as "sexual liberation" where-in, each whom in pursuit can operate publically in pursuit of a partner or relationship without the culturally distinguishing barriers involving the unhealthy and individuality that condones a "hill-people of the town" mentality. Where the person is confined in situations that are vague, while bottle-necking and always under a financial constraint. Almost to construe that getting open involved in healthy sexual relationship may abridge some or fasten the condemnation of demonstrable social morals and domestically socialized "logical conformity"
**"Sheltering"**
--
The propensity of sexual behaviour is not intuitive because is of a closer political application that only is representative of genetics; I.e, as a byproduct through effective social lubrication.
For example, the connotation of sexual liberation is conceived socially as an ability to procure sexual partners through open sexual behaviour .. but the logic of a gun-rights activist is not going to be seen flashing a firearm or printing on purpose. It is against the logical and natural convention. Even sexually motivated communities lose the understanding in their cultivation of objective secularism. They cost themselves the true opportunity to have been eliciting reason in their practices.
The objective extension to a 1 is a one, but if you tried to amplify that "one" if one is a unit of sexuality... Then by extension the only true exemplification of sexuality if you maximized units would be orgiastic in nature involving polyamory to mitigate practical mechanical failure. The expectation by my observations in this species writing are only more condoning of the misinterpretation that sexuality if truly exemplified for its nature is .. Rape. Thanks to presumably C.I.A/Tutonic order or other regiments of caroling groups in the theatre... While the expansionism of ideology does not matter, the practitioners need justification.
Lacking this will inherently distinguish both communal and individual failure in understanding when put to duress. In reality rapists only want to be raped. The socializing of the convention further is spiritually noted as "demonic"
Demonic practice is the relative situation to Egyptian worship .. being the idealogical practice of worshipping in not attribution, but worshipping attribution itself, while the beings themselves are not a source but in engagement, only mirrors. The idea of a brain fart at times may seem like connotative reference is a struggle, but the reality is that christians are trying to use their existential circumstances as a trap to maliciously relay information as if you permitted transmission. The philosophical black mirror is demon worship. You put your ideas and love into a thing that does not *think, in itself or otherwise* then you project... Then in that projection have that idea maimed, bastardized or returned in the matter. Interference operated by christians in rebellion.
Deuteronomy
--
The consistency between sexual normality and the bridging into abnormality .. Commonly referred to as fetishization are more or less neurological correlative executions prepared by christians to force an artificial examination, generally in an ineptitude of being capable of understanding...
Much akin to a baby... That was old... But never became more than a baby, but also never has memory... Maybe a glimpsing apparition related to punishment and in that examination of "If I get punished, then why do they not get punished" in general for irrelevant or unrelated but in objective politicization from cronus... ("Body of christ" as a chronologically asymmetrical reflective satellite) Of mnemosyne (Known as the "holy spirit" The chronologically asymmetrical echo of others I involved myself with) and amun/ites (The direct reflection of contaminated interjection, echoing in time through the encapsulation in lower/less relevant convention of the mechanisms of the world)
*Always in specific relation to sexual behaviour*
Comments
Post a Comment