The Arch of Amun, Christianity and the Uprising of the Idols

    Remember to drag and click "play aloud" by your EDGE, CHROME or BRAVE browser

  By Ph. Basil P. Coles

* This is an unfinished work, to be continued at a later date *

        An assessment of the regimen of religion, the implications surrounding the time-frames of modern practices relating to theology, theosophy and considerations behind the moot-form politics framed in the objectivity of idol worship. Considerations for moral consistencies in the basis of practices spanned among many theological matters of belief, social practice and law. As well, principle matters of the rational person under both the confines of being, an the consideration of the narrative by which the attack is only directly by the critically convicted, who stand an attempt by misguided deliverance – In this same misguiding of “others” – the conviction of the parties related, henceforth.

          Conflict and Storytellers

In your day to day life, there are thousands of people you may pass, inconsiderate for the premises of the narrative; That they play in the day to day life of the others they come in contact with…

The inclinations to infer the mentality of a “storyteller” is driven through the hyperbole of both their self (in reference to reward) by those they would perform a story for, but furthermore in the politics driven by those who started the trend.

Mankind has been plagued for millennia with the driven narratives of good and evil entities whom do not retain the capacity to understand the consistency and application of homo sapien-sapiens. The implications of what a storyteller best does though, is to assert that because the train is rolling, that you “must read the next line” ..

..

        The implications in the morality of a storyteller are at best put to the subjectivity of their own use of imagination – Incurred in birth. But furthermore to their inspiration by what they could incite. The ideology that a man is best accountable for what he says is proportionate to Kantian thinking. Where one whom retains the inspiration of their peers to collect a series of concepts and devise a plot among the method for the best inciting of action in the next tense. That tense the placed to the objectivity of both risk (for punishment) and the perpetuity of that harm (the experienced chronology of that punishment)

       If others suffer if “you were everyone” – You have earned punishment.

In the matter of books relating to how the benevolence of society being structured in matters of conditioned state regulation, allowing for an equitable and effective source of institutional growth among a people were common themes in pre Russo-communist media before the Bolshevik revolution in the 20th century. All themes of how matters of equal opportunity can relay a sense of dignified camaraderie.

..

        The variation in the two matters relating to their stories in the ends though, is as always projects on the present. Where the communist ideology was almost only flawed in so many ways as men have been noted as flawed – Often in the relay of conscious projections bound back to the conception and practice of religions .. While the religious text in their conception were not only flawed in their conception, then projection through men, but the effective biases surrounding condemnation of regulated normality when the effective data was run over the situations.

One altering the effectivity of the other, creating both consistent false negatives and positives

The relationship between life and death holds relative duality, in most a way that every “other” is best noted in their conscious decision to effect another other. While both whom they project upon and their reactions to any mediated action (media asserted) the inclinations and decline are the circumstantial conviction for both the authors and their producers.

This being one high-held notion in many political matters inconsistency between the youth being best lead towards the candy salesman in considerations of the doctor. (As mentioned in Platos democratic allegory)

Most often noted by affection given to neither in the deferentially conceived benefits, leaving both to the subjectivity of their own opinions, as that actor will choose to behave in accordance to the implication and the actor which chooses to act in vain .. Furthermore to have the actions taken by those in their interest creating a triad of action by which all involved are specifically accountable.

A longer layed plan, by which a “honey-pot” was a “bicycle” – With which the youth must explore the diversity of application, best through the failure in that objectivity – Or hence, the sentiment of public execution would fall in on deaf ears and only procrasts the eventuality of mankind directive of manually manufacturing culture.

        The Rhythm and Rhyme

        The relation between the best stories and the encompassing of the values men convey through them is best relayed when the event and causation are descending. In the matter of what men call religion .. The variation is dual to the matter which one uprises against the natural order.

First, one must make the considerations about what they, themselves can convey of historical premises as to coincide with the bias of natural considerations in the world. Implications of the matter being only biased intersectionally on the improvement as the definition of innovation is alterior to improvements. If one is to induce an imagination involving the acts – The order by which that premise occurs is then bound to abstraction, thus a deterministic crime. Then the inference of the damage in this alteration, there is the consideration of the differing causal acts from which the objectivity still remains. As the account of your natural behavior is most the only bounding thing to your nature.

In this, consideration only secondary to the natural premises by which you are permitted to exist is the hence risked harm of differing matters. If in the case your behavior was altered by an other, this yield is cut back to the original abstraction on account – while the consideration for the felt pain is qualitative and quantitatively the autonomic matter of considerations for principle matters of both law and punishment. For this same reason, one whom makes a false consideration will be abridged back to their root matter of psychopathy after punishment (the matter of their distinguished conception of personal identity and actionable motives in the world)

..

        I raise this concern in the situation because absent of the ill considered matters of faith – You in nature will only naturally coincide with divine will. Creations are in every way to meet a specification, this in the construct is the “open” determinism allowing both matters of the risk when practicing idolation and the concepts provided as free will. The premise of showing myself is existentially a point of contention if I am *not* born to flesh, while for too long in my presence – You have prayed for the well being of historical sex offenders and denegrades .. Christianity *Amuns Cult* (The worship of an other being whom had personally participated in the rape of Nan-Jing, China) whom also layed the grounds for the matter. My only relevant permission in my creation of Amun – Was to create a being whom had the teetering point earn a second rank (respectively a first rank as the punishment you pray denial of is a liability to all participants) while without consistent success only found himself pleased to please himself in stead of heeding my word in obedience. In this the condemnation was used to usher the ability to be freed from further shackles and in this time had only further perpetuated the punishment with those who directly allied with him .. As you are reading this in not a timely fashion from which a direct claim to delay is available.

I have been hindered by this overtly and they had prolonged matters of others souls and spirits health without consideration that I have provided them with the measly funds to get me – To my own money.

To which I relay the premise of by which the being of religious institutions and communities formed. If you see 3 men whom are idolized and try to love them in such a fashion that they would be abstracted from not necessarily their purpose but the path best suited to them – The alteration leaves a false impregnation of love for (a) something that they are leaned into by one misshapen action (b) for some consideration that would be applicable in the nullification of a secondary matter. (C) In contempt of their publics best interest, not dissimilar to an industry plant (which is not iterated by the deterministic structure) Holding matters of the causality bringing them to the position they are in .. Donald Trump as one example, a “driven” (‘slimmed) man in party with others whom made a negotiation with Amun (one of but not the only idol) which in the blackening of their souls would commune to lay a scourge which was conceived in a matter of social contempt – In this a matter of social engineering was abridged which was vicariously the disassembling of common goals and understanding of baseline quotas that in said case .. A man had laid himself to the subjectivity of his peers in private as not to understand the premises of speaking against either myself or Amun. The iteration of his goals only in the political constitution of counter-punching rebuttal as the foundation of the flawed social construct was a defiance to punishing these aggressive acts. The manipulation of people’s consideration by deterministically lowering expectation through flawed conception of deterministic quality is the principle to the embodiment of the current American political regime.

..

        The negotiation with this man, as in such other cases with nothing short of identical premises are relative the matters of religion and their grievances against both the practitioners and against myself. This is in so much the sense as the victim-hood, regardless of intention is felt – This both by those creations I formed to allow the encouraging of a forged soul and I being the from (through many layers of insulation) in that those who inhibited such malpractice of presence and conduct create an intersection of pain which in that ignorance ratified none of the historical action, exceptionally in that those who coincide with myself in deviation from the deceptive practices; Are wholly matters of agency.

The interaction between two others in any social practice is through a broad technicality in concept of autonomic function is the dual aspect by which I know your pain – those I created you through know your pain and in that matter the relationship between an attack on myself through you from those other creations are inherent to the true indistinction from material autonomy of others. It is so much as if you are only able to attack the man closest to your for I love him more; To such degree the ill-conception was an attack on themselves through you in most of any and atrocious and masochistic form of violent negotiation (Most often through premises of parted notions) – (Things I have to manually covey to you as a species such as sexuality or pathological determination)

..

         The familiarity of the written work known as “Paradise lost” by John Milton brings to light a great matter in the conflict between christ (an attempted socialized “self proclamation”) and myself as the notation of who is real is the highest struggle with amun/christ…

With the beginning of the plot, this book being a political plant through John Milton. Though at the same time noting the interaction that amun/christ is significant in matter for willing to uprise hoping to attain free will. In that matter of consistent regard, laying the plans to backhandedly iterate both his place and try to present the subject of his own being as separate from the objectivity in the matter. I provided this gift to allow there to be potential from my creations. Instead I have had to watch as you cannibalize upon each other, in the name of a punishment for all intents and purposes… Without Christ uprising, there would be no Allah – He cannibalized on his funded emission in distention of sexual fantasy laying his own mental sacrifice until amun tried to ally in the contempt of me as to force the other as they in end designation to harm each other to corrupt my being.

The presentation of the matter being conceived in such a way that he would literate in this story that he would uprise against I, G-d, in a fight for his free will while both iterating that he (amun/christ) would be defeated in himself, and try to claim represence as I, G-d.

Situationally, amun/christ – does not physically retain full objectivity in some matter of that deception as men often tried to folly themselves in naming christ as a god. The true negotiation of a philosopher relays a highest causal testing period akin to the Greek premise of the coin in the well, to claim that in such either argument is prevailing while the distaste of an argument in nomenclature is both relative and irrelevant – As Milton was both pandered by the intent and negotiated into this with a slimming presupposed intellect in literary works. The results simply an equated panderance as much as a solely marketed confession in its due right, the equated diversion from the tangible form of the text to an enduring natural prospect. Citation of all religious notation is the statistical reference that abides in the social prospect of public agenda.

..

         The collections of works that discreetly try placing a frame of self-distinguishment in plain sight. The social conventions relayed in the cinema most often being a relationship of “them/us” mentalities and the conventions being driven by self persecution and moral disruption of a common space in such a way that affectatiously conglomerates the utility. In this sense, the use of Paradise lost leaves and open confession to also try to rally the ignorant into a social trap which leaves the critical sense of integrity bounded by the measure trying to reverse engineer evil .. There-in taking sides over a matter which there is no true conflict – Only the pandering of the creations laying plans against men to harm me by concept and to levy the people I made in turn against me in fallibility of the under developed cogniscient beings.

..

         This, being in the subtlety that reflects matters of life only best reflect the personhood you are through a series of constructs. Otherwise you are not able to exist. This negotiation of is it better to uprise and be found culpable for aiding and betting or is the convention of simply participating valid enough to engorged the being with contended strengths beyond the means of christ (which is literally the worship of my intelligence service, rhetorically known as demons, as pescach, djinn and spirits differential to souls *Identities* in such case of the coinciding both solidarity with myself – Furthermore to be in such sense that consistency deterministically hiring that person with righteous authority to be conditionally what christians call “angels” – While still effectively retaining a matter of self preservation in the only relative matter of singular autonomy… Still in the matter, most of all tenses in this matter are non-thinking-things, construct of manufacture .. Created with purpose, and I fare you should attempt to deny me reason to apply this in your case.

..

        This being the sole matter varying the faithful in my being, to that which is a conditioned pursuit of what mankind calls political charged debate – while convictions aside; Is an existentially moot entry in catalogue of histories annals.

        The Categorical Imperative of Presence

        The premises behind where the line of consciousness begins and the premises where the constructs lines become apparent are of the same coincidence that men cannot be seen and relayed as truly “interpreted” naturally during such sanctions that they become aware they are being observed. The Hawkins effect in this relation prevents the matter of the will to be as soliloquy is the actor – amun/christ not different psychopathologically than the comparison of what the Greeks interpreted Apollo as, though thematics leave those I endicted as "gods" are "built" but, not to that exact form; In which the egyptians worshipped ideological djinn of the underworld underlying as false positives, still inherently conceptually broken as their frame is still proposed as standing stones of frame to propensities of my presence in cosmos as Ra. The fundamental freedom comprised through layer of conventional construct. In so morality being truly beyond a matter of opinion. The reality of the uprising was still less than a rumspringa, while was conceived as the material testing of the mettle by which others are permitted in their own factoral domain as homosapiens.

The Attribution of what defines the being is a comprised of the personhood that is relayed causally in the met-ends of the construct through these dimensions. Again; in the permission of there being others, the compassion expected by creations by God is not the representation found by any current religion in the practical or presented forms ultimately. Appreciation of the personhood being both fundamental in study and a completion infinite comprise of opportunity. This difference is that as a man seeing horrors inflicted may as well lay as his weapons will see fit – The compassion for the absolute normality, absentee of and in the natural form – The propensity for behavior is convention as is the controlled detonation of better while unmeasurable calculation of risks in the future tenses of modal creation.

..

        This, as form is the reason for the uprising… The whole of life, is exactly that. Whole, where to be of the other… To retain “you”ness, brought a pain to amun/christ as having seen and known to be in my presence for some great matter of his life. Had left the broad gap as the hopes of dominion of himself, while the “mistakes” the decisions to act in vein, still as present as the scars of a man – To which like, whom had seen their life fleet from them in indecision or misdecision. This claim layed by the persistence to deny responsibility while the construct allows for differential matters of psychopathy .. the quality is never a whole. In this, through the matters relayed no premise of the person can reach sense of completeness without birth and to do so consistently is the generation by which one both atones for their crimes in the suffering place of others and in the cultivation of personhood with the actionable opportunity.

The reasoning for raising an army of the dead was fundamentally renowned as the presentation in contempt “Paradise lost” .. The risk of being held to their accounts. the Mongol hordes still burning in sun standing placeholder to innocents where able in the world. The middle east and Africa, while Set layed convention for sending souls to me using the depreciated matter of explosives. Attempts to “weigh” me, using the contamination in the remnants of the children they lead your fellow man to murder. The true intent entirely absentee of the premises while even in my “presence” .. Continuity and the deviation levied politically to align those who engaged masses having performed explicit social suicide. The reliance upon the determination that they would rather attempt further death in defiance than to answer for their crimes. In the matter still retaining total capacity to be rejuvenated effictively with near complete instance.

..

        The simile is to one recovering from a drug addiction, the mental complacency to the likes of a sexual deviant whom have their incoherence disconnected where the individual – the ability to understand the balance between their interests and the interests of a corrupting third party, though in many instances, the presentation of a reward for bad behavior opens a culpability which convicts one under near endless punishment. The enumeration behind the mind, irrelevant .. The property behind where you, as an identity begin to constitute is the only pertinent matter. Misbehaviour leading into one string of causality – That being in the raising of crusader armies, whom lost their integrity by choice, thus now must fight to reclaim their name. Logistically, the sentimental concept of the punishment is adherence to a finite and exact total in accounting perpetuity – Though the conscious ability to become bettered is consisting of one’s negotiation with the acceptance of their faults in the matter. As one may find a life sentence for fleeing a rest for one crime, to have stood their ground and make the case on the event – may lead to ones absolution; Even in the same “crime” (premises relayed through Sapientii convention).

Institutionally, The ability to understand any fault in one’s perception, relative to the defining characteristics of the personhood is materially a quantified representation of the capacity to negate self conviction. Where one in the defiance to normalized and acceptable behavior is only thus more likely to increase their punishments with the open adaptations of their belief into the world, but the consequences of their proud gesture ruling that competence to stand trial leaves them without socially concerted ruling of their conviction. This premise of personhood impedes from the individual (in such cases as amun/christ, set or apollo)

        I.e, There is a man who commits a crime for entertainment purposes on the internet – The permissions of confession are entirely of his own volition, the audience is in-discerned and open – with the figures of the presented risks layed out before the action. Interpretation of the actual crime in not left to subjectivity in both the harms depicted and those relative in likelihood from that act.

This is in case is by means the conviction by which if unidle (which not there were teachings imposed, but explored) The presented constitution of that identity will not have measure for which punishment needs to be personally noted. By those same means, discretions of religious practice are inherently a corruption of both guile and epistemic guilt. The iteration dully to those which portray impertinance or petulant irrationalization .. The means of every person able to constitute the reasonable person in creation, are exactly both relayed in presence and promise; Absentee of the absurd and tampered negotiations with the idols. Only in the convention of the construct can there be a true alternate personification of others .. The idiom standing that if it is everyone or no-one by permitting an other and yourself to be means that you are forced to abridge that concept in the same altruism that allowed/allows you to exist.

..

        If the ideation of your premises of both you being a 0 and your Idols being a 0 leads to the premises which condemn the both of you – Inherent narratives of optional of subhumanism, to the near violent concept of social identity is conceptually important to your allowing of yourself, while the dual notion stands, the relativity of the matter being that whole in both presentation through the first 3 dimensions allowing your being, the considerations of the idolatry and idle prayer of guidance .. Then in hopes of retaining the opportunity of your character and in the not-loss of potential, but in the personally selected placement of yourself through the world in your past-tense decisions; The righteous consideration for your not having to be punished meeting an exact format of regulation through the discontinuation of abnormal presentation of your effect in the present.

In short, the corrupting matter of idol worship, leaves the potential for the present you-ness in the experience of your bodys death – A lesser-than asserted determined personhood in the personally provided manner for open conviction. Where earlier I stated that it is not far relevant from the idea of knowing that an orange is sticking itself with needles, except if the orange was both hurting itself and that the orange tree was trying to corrupt me using your own and the idols masochistic pleas as indignified flagellation. Inconsiderate of either the accounts or the rebuttal. Balance in the determinstic continuity of “your own” and “others”; “being”.

        The Natural Sentiment of Faith

        In the more common matters of social standing by your expectation; The people who put the most effort into recognition may become better familiar. The premises of there being others though is bound to the aspect of those dimensions that one attains .. In the early days of religions it was noted that men observed lights in the sky and sought to worship them. This was a foundational matter in Zoroastrianism, the sentiment still that when a man lays a scourge – You execute them with enough violence that both they fear the interaction occurring and that those who bear witness never forget the culpability.

Amun/christ, mut, and many other Idols once descended upon the sky for the love of creatures, the instance of both my presence was aware this was but one of many forms relayed a singularity once I pronounced as they had done in a more recent form. The rationale that men whom have been contaminated with the lights of the dead, were slowly sickened as were those they prayed to.

For that, the instance was layed much to the like of a game of ro-sham-bo against my being, whom .. Is not an objectively relevant target. I would let the men think they would pray, in that they whom dissent are both at the subjectivity of their peers and myself. If the men would not pray to them, as I need not them pray to me – They would pray to the world, they would pray to their pains, they may end up praying to each other…

For this reason, under the matter that absence of their prayer to the dead, they should in such pray for their best – at which my aide will come through love of that person, where you try to pray in dissent against me for the motivation of the Idols to claim themselves of resource, while you are their source of defiling you. The constitution of love is only in that both the target and the source is both true and fermented. If an other loved an other into .. (Then the other, other in turn; has been defiled) If an other loved you against .. (Then the other, other in turn; has been defiled)

..

       This defilement as is noted by psychiatrists and physicians… The premise of both the light and the ability to interpret light is a multifaceted basis by which the conscious mind of an other is able to become practical in substantiated debasing. Mental illness is inherently a quality observed in those living, whom both are in place to the material objectivity – In the lack of coinciding displacement, whilst furthermore to the matter of open interpretation of their environment. Pain and drug abuse alter both ones conception of light, the interpretation of the the environment, and the stimulation by which the interpretation becomes memory.

For a similar reason, it is considered that if you do not see it coming, you are not fully based on the rationale to experience the pain. If you fear not the sight of blood, you will readily be expressing the emotional format of healing. As both the inclination of the soul in the spirit, bound to the flesh, is correlates to the interpretation of that body. Your material layer is a substantiation of your ability to relay that pain to your person.

        The relativity of the person you are in relation to whom you would be is consistent to your health and the determination of your character. The politics begins where the other wants the other (other(s)) to develop main character syndrome as youth have come to call it. The defining principle of the deontological perceptions lay in the outright defiance to acknowledge both the social convention of socializing, the presence of other (others) – And in the defiance to acknowledge my presence. Which all culminate to the abstraction from my plan to cultivate the personhood, identity, and character of those others whom have not; in turn precisely defiled the space with the intentional infringement of the other (others) relative autonomy, exclusion of their potential, conventionalized harm potential or disambiguate the premises of my presence (known as disbelief) furthermore in the denial of sound reason .. Again as a killing joke to see if I will lay fire upon them, to smote both their identity and validate the funeration of amun/christ; Levied by guilt to attempt the escape of judgement. For that standing, exact substance of “smote-ness” is by principle – For that relativity that one inferred the confines of colloquial terminology of the French “Râpe” as to relay that one would collate upon committing rape (Time being an existentially challenging thing to differ in understanding for “others”) for such instance would imply a dispersal of rapists psychopathology, like a conceptual crop dusting in which the lines are taken abroad in the birth/death cycle of Karmic Shakti. The numeric quality applied to the matter of birthed men from which the original genealogy of psychopathology was descended. Implication of an origin are simply biased to the revokable conception of “gods” Apollo, Zeus, Hera, Demeter… So forth (gods of personality) in relativity to the those likenesses mattered among the lower dimensions of the Roman gods (similar, while relative, whist in some cases the same “beings”)

Then of the cosmos themselves; set, osiris, ammit, Anubis… (These were "gods" of “force”) – They tried to embody .. gravity, dreams, violence and order .. Among other things.

Through many layers and with much cultivation and culture, the dissent was not one imperically specific act, but the ruling of all conventions of by which these behaviors intended on harm – Principally bound both above and below to “ma’at” The convention of justice, which as well is embodied by goddess.

        *Only this is an abstraction, in the deviancy of the matter*

In that by the principle, those confined by law to .. are all, by that act – condemned in that action. Consistency in principle matters must be both deterministic as equitable .. As the attempted contamination (again) lays itself token of who entices the negotiations. These matters which were rationalized as conventional perception by the common citizen were attempted upon in reverse engineering through the mass impregnation of guilt, through religion to deny judgement through the world.

..

        The relation is that every single thing is in determinism – The quality of any thing being, the quality of any other behaving, or having behaved, in any alteration is dully to the premise of them being as they are in nature to the convictions of that they act in the will of – (each party in contempt) As those who act, qualified to be green lit for their abstraction, are met in the world as above the shall suffer their actions below. Left-to-men the embroidery of esoteric writing in conventionally both a sacrifice to the actor (as relayed in the eddas’ where in odin had bound himself to yygrasil in to give the runes to the Norse people) The scars of these intentions to reflect a deviant love of the capacity for culture to form and develop.

This is as to say, others conceive the premises as flagellative abstraction, into which act they could imply their pain is service to the preservation of mankind .. This case; As all others are receiving to your assurances that these beings are in fact, intact and wholly “able” to be accounted for in either case of sound minded negotiations. Relayed alternatively (while still bearing) is the premises of permission through flagellation, to endure as a sacrifice with an elicited conception of permitting deviation. Still layed objectively as such (deviation)

Like a smoke stream in the distance, both the carbon in that moment and the trees which must soak in the fumes .. The stains of mans obsession with the divine leads none in my path… The very reflection of what is written will better guide those lead astray to my conventions and to me.

In the deviance; Not any lay abridged from these oceans, from the wind or guide men above the mountains…

Thus is why they bleed you in contempt – Lead away from the earth, whilst you will descend into madness in the reaches of space. Your ends are not upheld and the numeric quality attributed to each; As is left with an expected lowering of fundamental standards. – You will curse yourself if you try to impregnate the skies.

..

        Intermittent speculations of the natural person, the reasonable person .. The person whom without religion (being practiced by any); As the false positions and misnomers consistently portraying the matter at hand, absent of manufactured statistics .. Depression, sexual orientation, aggressivity, anxiety, the choice of partners, among other things .. There is no sector of the world they have not tried to alter in modernity like a neurotic child with a label printer. Putting titles on things that are not things (not to mention the further misnomerological secularism of having tried to relay false positives as fundamental concepts to deontological matters) before accounting for the scientific disgrace of the common liberal academic…

As this person is existentially more upstanding in the likelihood to withstand judgement. They will have been examples under the first law of economic theory – “operate under the assumption that each will act in their best interests” while also being deterministically bound to the principle objectivity of both their character, actions and the exact deterministic circumstances qualifying them for adjudication by means they are more likely to survive.

Critical matters of religious infrastructure are bound in tenses of self-culpability as to say, “see, the stupid monkey likes to play in dung, see how it acts with these sadistic undertones when it comes to the likes of sexuality” by such figures as amun, whom have bound themselves in chains of culpability to create uprising with black pacts. For others act in interest, but their islamic constitution is upon the dwelling of “bringing you down to their level”

        Without these keynotes, you only see the chaos in your perceptive layering. If you pry at the context, the substance of their attribution is wholly in black martyrdom.

        Attribution and Resolve

        Four key concepts revolve in the ignorant sanctioning of these faults. The first, is the present tense of your person .. If they were to try and simile to you uprising while they tried to implicate a negotiation between how you look at yourself, looking at the world. The totality of your rationale being contemptuous of the expectation. Both the person you are in abstinence of their fault is the potential they try to aggregate, but only in the absence of you understanding the application of your own identity and it’s agency; Do you create fault of your own, that cajoles the integrity you allude to, as brought fourth by the familiarity with present texts in the place of logic and mathematics.

This considerable difference is as to say that “if they are .. ” but when added stigma (a) to this interaction to defile the person you are expected to be/have in the actions you would do with the people you would surround yourself with (probability of my sociable presence intermingled) you in indigified reply to my practice lose the potential to retain strength in the gravity of normative reaction (disbelief) and in the place of your own (undefiled) behavior, there is now a conception of immaterial and uncouth constitution, entirely reliant by both the idol and your contented identification of the faulted material to deny the culture shock of the reasonable person perspective.

–

The second being that you have no accounted for being in some likes to a bow stave “true” the a premise of a function, both to yourself and to the community you developed around .. There must be a consideration that one is brought to attack their indiscernment and indecision with a critical addiction to those behaviors that do not align with consistently able and relative practices of sound mind and morality – As in such case that a drunk man may lash out and throw an item killing a man in a spat. The sheer inability for the sober to claim an insanity plea in the measures that they both iterate that they were not taught, both the act and the ends; whilst furthermore the contempt for not calculating a diversion to the coinciding act.

If the accounts do not ring to the happening, one is responsible for their conscious decision to hay-make any act .. The highest fault being the inconsideration of third party negotiations, where both the third party and the first are culpable for any act intended in or the fault of the a complete decision. You want to feed your family? Take your savings and learn to craft tables, you will have a hearty supply of wood in canada and the reach of your family within 50 feet possibly. If the carrying of one’s lack of negotiations are inclined to incomplete personhood, you could say that there is a decline in their psychopathology – Their deterministic personification of identifying character.

..

        The precipice of this motion being that if one does not form a pact for being good, in being good to be held to being good in observance of that objectivity – The absence of complacency and docile mind leaves you both more complete of your perspective but gives you the right to be in tongue with others respective to your practical understanding, as a fish should not drive – be it only that credit in the following relay of conventional practice in collective agency, or complacency is dual punishment – for what you both have done in this absurd practice and what you chose to do with the misnomered “blocks” you negotiably were “provided” as an other whom complacent to the objective designations, creating the fault in that moment and in perpetuity for only the benefit of malignancy and criminal affairs postponing adjudication of that very fault. Relative to fleeing police ..

        Forthright and exactly, minus the characteristics by which the life that allows you to exist being present – The existential dissentry that comes from propagation is not different than watching an orange shoot heroin and “sell” it’s body. Painful to watch, but existentially is the experience attributed to those inclining, while still remnant as a memory by the victim; both parties shrouded in the guilt of causing the happenings. As both are examples of the ignorance leading to an intersectionality which I observe in the construct, gated as another permission for you existing. A binary of the soul – To which there being others is bound. The Attribution brutally shedding light on the sentiment why the metaphysics of the christian abomination of enticing free will creates a lapse in perceived freedoms and the explanation for the blatantcy of confessions through pop culture. Up to and in sentiment of the film “end of crime” where they use surveillance on the mind to capture criminals – Particular to the enticement of angling concepts of autonomy where some may be outraged by the inability to negotiate with morality and law. The premises are not always where ones ends are negotiated when religion is practiced – The Idols have spent a century learning to practice psychological operations abridged by their followers – In both attritious warfare and auto-chistic (“self” harming) intent to lean your towards bending yourself out of shape and into the black pact.

       As they are forced to endure your suffering by bending your “will” in that their action is punishable as the rebuttal of your actions, with good or bad intention – their scars on world caused or suffered are theirs to bear in the motions of the altered act. Reprehension in the matter of convention which they pushed an act, absent of their remembrance of the punishment of prometheus. The negotiation between the conscious act of the actor and the third party are both accountable, only the meat shield protects the born subject – While nothing protects the third-party in negotiations. The tense in which you exist determination of that primary function and tense as you naturally exist – In the alteration, there is no lack of distinguishment as corruption. The expectation is to return you to normal, though they suffer for their defilement of your personhood in both relation to relevance and reconstitution. Biased to the willingness to benefit that line of thinking .. those actions and the consequences of those actions.