Skip to main content

The Causality Between Mental Health And "Faith"

The Causality Between Mental Health & Faith

          Remember to play the text using a text to speech as in Microsoft edge or google voice.

By Ph. Basil P. Coles

Auto-Didactic Polymath – Privately Published

2024

Schrödinger’s equation

I’m sure that you are familiar with the popularised anecdote or the paradigm of their either living or dead cat, or that you cannot identify something you have not yet encountered. Well in this inference, the probability of the average person trying to have a religious experience is nothing short of the very striving for this instability and with this, I will discuss a series of methodologies where-in one has who has been exposed to this phenomenon is both at risk of decline and the risks that involving yourself in this poses. I feel this has been primarily left out of research due to the general sensitivity of people who want to see others simply be happy – but there are higher costs than someone feeling their autonomy has been trampled. This is something that has posed a threat higher to this species than any weapon or ideology, for this is the disassembling of your personification in full form to adopt the branches of belief of others both in the subconscious and in the mundane.

I want the reader to explore the reasoning for these phenomena and to disprove through research of what the phenomenon leads to as there is no inconsistency between a secondary narrative that runs through those who have been touched by this. It has been dangerous, harmful and only to show leniency I have found a rare case where a criminal, let alone one in truly devoted “slim-mind” has reformed – but without consistency, have I found a person who has not trespassed become better through these practices. They find the feeble of mind and the naive and use the narrative that it is a path they were put on; Without regards for the fact they would mature without these secondary experiences to the conscious mind in the mundane.

In regards to belief systems, I found that the only consistency between what people aim for when approaching these is the mind balances the conscious state. The emotions blend the person you are into the subconscious – The relativity of the aware person you are becomes susceptible when you open the door with free-association (hope for stimulation from a religious experience) or the general broadening of perceptions without clear focus upon deterministic concentration. Religious sentiments behind consumption have been noted, but the primary issue is the promotion of the third parties that have taken responsibility for the tampering with many minds whom, themselves… did not endorse the phenomenon through religious practice. Clarification of this problem is notable for the public lenses and conceptions of free will are what these third parties try to accept and negotiate with as your liberally noted free will.

Thus my conception of sound-mind (where one considers the challenging of their own deterministic free will and rationally concentrated identity) to “slim-mind” (Where one is not at the conscious state referring to differing premises behind their subconscious action in relation to things such as sexuality, compulsions, anger, fear, hatred and obsession; with the direct response to the act of negotiation being that one consciously defies deception (and) negotiations with third parties both in (and) out of their best interests) Risking the integrity of their character without conceived notions of “quantum debt…”

I come to address the concern that when some practice religion, that many are affected. Through the direct actions of those who have had their thoughts intercepted, added to or mutated, but furthermore that by practicing these faiths; that those whom deny the practice may have a risk of being altered in their action potential due to the promotion by others.

Such is the very practice of mindfulness, to understand when there is as third party bothering you and finding focus in other things.

          3’s and 7’s

          Every time you focus, there is a little split between who you are to who you want to be in that moment. When you are not paying attention – you may feel a discomfort, whether that be towards or away from any specific belief or thought… It must be questioned as to the degree that you are the one who is holding that belief or if the very nature of your beliefs in that small moment have been altered by another. People have for Millenia practiced what is called “Kabbalah” it is a form of Jewish mysticism that uses the principles that your mind is the gateway to the next life. To learn things as if you were dead that you would not know while alive such as methods of thinking without philosophy, skills without practice or knowledge of geometry.

While I stand by the promotion of wisdom, the essence of how this knowledge is collected is of some scruple. The very notion that through submission of ones sound mind they could come out skilled or knowledgeable in such cases as Rueben Nsemoh who awoke from a coma only speaking fluent Spanish. This was cited by yale university, and the phenomenon has been noted on other occasions where others have learned other languages during or after injuries. I raise this concern because through the same practice that these men have learned languages, what can we tell of dangerous uninhibited knowledge? Those who suffer trauma becoming distracted for weeks of their childhood to come to the realization that they should become nullified and modify their gender to meet this “third party(s)” needs? To say so much as when you are afraid of something and your anxiety sends you into shock, what is it that happens when you come to the realization to act… Why would one person be hailed, and others be hindered if the nature of the third party being worshipped were a good being?

I raised this concern generally because the conscious mind is not a fickle thing. The mind has the ability to find the root of almost any problem given the right tools no matter the person, the place or the time. It is only matter of what the influences over that (or those a persons mind is subjected to). Alcohol dampens your subconscious but allows your conscious mind to be more present in the moment as if relieved of some distractions. Caffeine helps you focus on the task at hand, but without a task it is often noted to cause mania in people who have lost direction. With the concerns in mind for the common persons ability to retain focus. It leaves room for research into the paradigms that arise from the lack of discerning of what is actually causal to a persons psychopathology when they are left without the resources to properly integrate into society.

What does a baby know of life if never taught to speak, write, fight or study… Who is in fact in control of the narrative of the third party and most importantly who the third party is… Is a most critical directive to focus on when assessing the background to how the narratives form. It is not apparent that it is one being from my research, it is not even one singular branch of ideology that is taught by the “third party” it stands to be relative to either the basis of spirituality that one is not worshipping a good being, the beings who reach out are simply not god (or) that both are true and the nature of the narrative is up to the being who speaks as a third party.

I refer to the third party as such because of this analogy. Two people are walking, one starts to hear a voice… the other asks what is wrong the first accuses the other of what the voices said and the persons suspicion leads to violence. The third party started this and was not held accountable. Only the first man and for this reason the duality of this situation is something that this species should observe closely.

From couples with problems stemming from one of them working, the third party may incite feelings of distrust in their partner. This is a light portrayal of the first display, but all the way up to where fourteen Taliban commanders are designating targets for attack and they simply look at a map and where on the map is made obvious could be high lit in the subconscious mind, given the names of towns, ethnic/sexual groups, weapon Ideas or tactics as one of the seemingly only ones who reap the rewards of those who are praying – This mentality and narrative would be in line with the very distinguishments I have made with the last two.

The question stands that when you are not paying attention and you feel distracted, double vision, lazy eyes, wandering mind, mysterious jokes… You start laughing and look what people might call unstable, but in reality… there is a third party trying to discredit you with your forced reception of a joke, a frustration over a shared thought or through coaxing an act through fantasy or tampering with the autonomic nervous system in such cases as sexual arousal.

With this, I must ask that the nature of the conscious mind be studied in relation to the capacity, for one who has had religious experiences to share their journey, this including the mentally ill so that one side does not shadow the other giving a clear image. If anything, mental illness from what I can tell gives the “third party” a better basis to apply you as an agent in the world through the susceptibility to their interactions through the same phenomenon people practice prayer for – Only one group opens the door for the third party and the others are simply pushed through it.

(Now I am not saying that the person who acts will necessarily understand why it is that they are doing a specific act)

I am stating that they will act on the belief that they would expect to be in their own interest. Only in that the act is not being universally beneficial to anyone – for their own subconscious mind had been preyed upon by the “third party” who would intervene when you are for example… Using drugs and looking for an easy buck, convince a woman who could clean the floors of a mall – to sell her body for their entertainment. Which according to many theologies is something that corresponds to the nature of religion and the prayers which are not guided as well as better susceptibility once their self-esteem is plied out of the equation.

Whether we come to accept that when we don’t direct prayer, we don’t communicate with God but simply someone acting in their own intent to use your prayer or whether what you pray to is not good and simply sacrifices your fellow people to whomever gets back to them is something – you should all be cautious of. The nature of when you lose touch with reality is still reality… Whether they have a conscious basis in fact on the factors is irrelevant, their perceptions are worth noting for what they are and the extremity which they have branched off and lost touch, because someone is misdirecting them for personal gains. If you said that the phenomenon is natural, when it is coerced… And others believed you because you were credentialled? That would be they very definition of social psychosis. Where a society loses touch with reality because of bad information that they were given (By folks who have been accredited their say by others). Not dissimilar to children raised in the third reich and told that the Jewish people were subhuman… A belief motivated in the convenience of anothers goals will often seem well structured until one pulls the threads.

We must understand the premise of what it is that connects our mind to the world and all the factors that intertwine into the experience before we can start saying that it is simply and issue of perception as is these people were depressed and didn’t want to see the colors in the rainbow. There is an explanation for why the “third party” can always pass a Turing test and leave the victim susceptible to tampering in their conscious mind. It’s because the intervention in their thoughts is from a third party that has concurrently and effective attempted to dismantle the reputation of these people through debilitating mental illness that the universities call “Illness” as if there is an infection that can be purged when they need to be grown and developed no different than a child – often back from a child-like phallic state of pleasure seeking and risk taking behavior once the third party inclines communication. This would meet my profile expectation both of the beings who reach out and the application of such instances.

That if the person who reaches out is a broken, neurotic and sexually imposing fantasist – The goals involving blackmail for sovereignty among creatures would be logical as a 4rth dimensional strategy. As well as the effective sentiment behind the propagation, the place it comes from would as well be descript. As one can see a Nazi being unsettled by a mixed-race couple – If the being whom both wants to blackmail you does and how they do it is methodical to the differing accounts in the convenience of billable hours. Then whom does the blackmail leaves a physical (not tangible) “fingerprint”.

With that in mind, the strategy of addressing this is something of a critique of all deeds based on whom they came from in the nature of the “third parties” effect – you can only see whom they are by what decisions they made – defining who they are pathologically in the sentiment behind the binary decisions.

          Challenged Examination

          Challenged examination would be the best term for this as I have developed several psychometric examinations to test for intervention by this third party to identify where someone (a) May be on the spectrum of being affected (b) How affected and susceptible they are to the tampering of this third party and (c) What their potential to recover is when they are open in communication.

This has to do with first off, the development of their person. Each thinking thing has a set of properties specific to themselves which is their identity. If they have not developed those traits, then the third party may have made categorical adjustments to induce behavior as many see fit within a subculture which has already been affected. Concepts of self-persecution in urban black culture, curiosities relating to sexual fantasies, ill-temperament towards strangers who remind the subject of something distasteful.

Most of my examinations have to do with computers but keep in mind, there has to be an account for the fact the third party can pass a Turing test. If they do not want to be observed, they may simply leave the subject alone during examination to try to deny that there were issues to begin with. Hence that the examination would best require a similarity to the third party that I can best diagnose would be based in some Israeli technology that converts sound to light, it’s just adjusting the frequency in order to see what frequency best affects schizophrenics and manics to see what they are most bothered by and first how to bother them the same way and try to examine them with the tests while they are in a controlled environment while they are open about whether they are being affected by the third party as well as allowing them to speak in the context of there being a third party to be more open.

Majority of the people with these disorders don’t open up about how they feel about the symptoms because they know that they are being messed around with and coaxed, but if they told a physician that? They are trained to increase medication and destimulate them instead of increasing stimulation and observing them to be better noted as to the effect of the third party on them when they are actively able to channel what it is they are doing according to their own narrative and coach the direction of the narrative of the third party.

This would give context to the narrative of those causing the disorder and the degree of damage done through the stress caused by the disorder to properly allow for the integration of routine when the patient is not already distracted by being forced to bluff off and more or less weather the storm. With the open communication of the patient in acknowledging the third party, one allows the patient to be open about what is said by them, about them, their environment and the effect that narrative holds once presented to the patient.

*Contact for my examinations, they are not expensive to set up; but are slightly complicated balancing a use of technology and analysis*

Finally, to perform the examination of this… The physician must acknowledge to the patient the concept of the third party directly in order to open the lines of communication. Build context upon the narrative that is taught and correlate it to the narratives of other patients through other physicians in other areas. If the narratives become consistent, then you can identify through *as earlier mentioned* would allow for a profile of the third party across many accounts only building the structure (or) the consistency of the branches of ideology that come from the assumably many third parties all functioning in their own interests.

          Posed Threats & Other Anomalies

          I started this essay because it is not a rarity to encounter someone who can attest to the presence of a third party in their objective decision-making process. I have spent my life encountering these people and making small talk and at times making friends with them. I have been in relationships with people who have encountered death and have been permanently marred by the encounters that I stand to say present an imbalance to the perspective that one in sound mind may have not rationalized. My concern lay with the consistent notice of self-destruction from phallic cessation to the struggle with ones own mental stability and the considerations around it being a personal problem to where the problems root becomes a priority for public concern.

Below there will be small list of considerations surrounding risks that could be taken if this problem is not addressed and the nature of the problem being taboo to communicate in a professional manner has led to the deterioration of communication of these varying problems which incur too many victims to easily number in the parts of the world these are most prominent.

         Scaled Sexual Thoughts and the Relationship to Sexual Violence

         Problems relating to sexual health and the concurrent parts of our own tastes are often overlooked until there is a consequence for the inactivity of our awareness concerning the problem. In nations where sexual violence runs rampant, there is also a distinguishment of openness to religious practice. The variation in the religion is not as important as the practice itself. One practices religion to open their mind to be accepting of a third parties choices assistance and aide in making decisions. The opening of that direction is my concern in that when you have two things that always appear no matter where they are – there is causality. Religions that promote sexual violence are concerning, but if the men who commit these crimes were aware of the damage they were doing in their overlooking of if not their own victims, then the ignorance to what their neighbours do… They would have to face the realization of what they themselves are doing, and that is forming a pact with whom affected their subconscious.

When you study the consistency between sex offenders across all boards, you will find that they more often than not are rarely in touch with themselves and their own emotions. They find understanding not why what they do is wrong, but who they are leading to their causal offences. They are not in sound mind by a long shot but deterministically, it comes off as a symptom that the third party will degrade people until the make themselves nothing to others. Someone that anyone can kill without discerning for their being a current threat.

This being critical to the larger narrative that they are building these relationships by hurting anyone susceptible in order to nullify their say against them and given how people look at mental health in the current time, it is not a far cry to that this is a form of social blackmail. You cannot speak ill of me if you do all these bad things, and you don’t know why – Is the perception taught.

          The Popularization of Taught Ideology

          The essence of politics is to live a life where the things you do can carry downstream to impact anyone else in reach, and preying on the subconscious mind of those whom are distressed or ill is not something we can overlook. Take sexual abuse victims for starters, they are often left in a distrusting state, seeking relationships from a distance and curious about what is said of what they went through – Seeking their entertainment vicariously as to minimize risk. With that in mind, if one is made susceptible to being tampered with, through any means… Then those whom are available are at risk of being played as tools in the grand narrative of the third party. The practicality of this stands that if one is forced to be in communication in a way they cannot identify, then the ideologies that defy either humanism or logical reasoning must be suspect to be a part of the “third party(s)” narrative. 

If you calculate in their cases of sexual normative in society or the political beliefs that stem from the freedom of sexual acts that come from the political ideologies regarding Islamic theocracy… The considering practices of such as those relating to prostitution, rape and incest. In either case… They are not branched in the sound mind of an individual whom could be reasonably found to stand in part to an election, so with that in mind; The nature of what we view as reasonable to a person in sound mind is the baseline and that which leads in excess of that boundary must be considered as the repercussions of the phenomenon of the “third party”

          Risk of Educational Reception

          In such cases as were earlier mentioned regarding where some have awoken from comas with knowledge of languages. What if men were made to be aware of the gesturing or intent of this third party when looking at maps, learning to be comforted by the grip of small arms rifle, Comforted in interrogation to nullify the scope of culpability by on lookers, taught to spot vulnerabilities in people susceptible to manipulation, practical uses of fear or even to the extent of being directly instructed by those third parties that hurt some – but in interviews, show signature behavior of psychotic reception when the Taliban were interviewed back before they had a country to promote their (in my eyes, a primary source of this phenomenon) religion.

The way we come to adapt in our use of communication, in the way we learn how to fight. Then matter of psychological hardness and the negotiations we make with ourselves towards or away from self-destructive behavior. I see it as a marker of the breach between where we as people decide to instruct ourselves through application and the third party becoming a second to our first-hand experience when investigating things. Much to what people consider a gut feeling but an intuition relating to how we adapt to situations, thus where we draw the line between our knowledge and the knowledge of those who would attempt to cultivate is the binary to a narrative of constructing the person who would only to the third party be notable in application. With specifications to the LRA, Taliban, Boko Haram and others who portray a specific set of values that each have corrupted more people than you have likely seen in person. Comfort towards or away from the baseline experience of learning or aptitude involving skills such as those relating to espionage or warfare must be considered in a world boiling in conflict with the profit margins being in slaves who are at the whim of the same men whom practice religions built on susceptibility to the third party. Regarding how “Muslims” are “submissers” (to whom they think is god) and in such their practice of blind faith identifies themselves to be prioritized as “out of sound mind”.

         The Rotating Door

         As said in the beginning. I want this essay to be used as the argumentative grounds for research that I myself have had trouble being aided in investigating and the identical risks that I have presented in this essay I hope will feed the fire that stands to snuff out the grease fire burning the innocent in the world through the applications of the third party with the subjects of such acts being those whom retain susceptibility to the phenomenon once traumatized. I relate trauma in this essay as a primary aspect of the third parties influence because it is only once you have been made aware of the threat to ones psychology that one can address the conflict within ones self. I want the people who read this essay to explore and investigate these risks and the phenomenon as to root out and destroy it through addressing through the practice of both psychology and psychiatry to nullify the threat and address the victims of such in the instances that they can be recovered before they take to a life of crime or sexual violence and in such cases that they nullify their ability to negotiate with the public that they are able to be tested in confidence that we are addressing the root of the problem to hopefully balance the losses of integrity to the scale of the threat in its present tense.

I am willing to correspond regarding to the psychometric evaluations that I have developed. I am also intending on using these tests to examine people in the best chances to root the cause and the triggers to reduce the risk until the practices that I can only assume are propagated by religious practice are removed and destroyed. Let me know what I can do as I have spent the last 2 years pondering how to get this soluted and I can only assume that to some of you this is not the first email I have sent regarding this problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Way of Least Contact

The Way of Least Contact    By: Ph. Basil P. Coles. // + Support Article - https://someoftheworks.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-anatomy-of-violent-interaction.html *This is an unfinished work and will be continued at a later date* Remember to drag and click "play aloud" by your EDGE, CHROME or BRAVE browser           In this text I would like to infer as a social code of conduct. The interactions between common people is a problem that does infer that the culturing of further behaviour could lead to their personally irreversible consequence. The methods of conduct threaded into society in the new west is an ultimate separation from anything a socially conscious group can be lead to say is understanding of repercussions in their misunderstanding of their arisal. Both in the substantial profiteering and misguiding through abscess cultures; The interest being bound from the formation of groups and their unaccounted dismissal. The title of this code comes ...

A Treatise on Slavery & Its Purpose

  A Treatise on Slavery & Its Purpose 2025 - Privately Published. By Ph. Basil Coles This is an unfinished work, to be completed at a later date... Remember to drag and click "play aloud" by your EDGE, CHROME or BRAVE browser An examination of the concept in the reality of its practice, methodology behind the mechanical operation of the practice and the relations to the proprietary concept of punishment. These being negligent to the conceived and polarised history of the practice, as I simply do not respect the work of idiots (Those, whom under natural circumstances; Would be simply shot by a stranger for these malfunctioning behaviours or eaten by those beautiful beasts in nature) or idolators...           Part one - Slavery & Its Purpose           During the early conceptions of the practice, the duality of the understanding that there are whom are members of the tribe, and there are those whom are not. they have in their...

The Anatomy of Violent Interaction & Jurisprudence.

The Anatomy of Violent Interaction & Jurisprudence By: Ph.  Basil. P. Coles *This is an unfinished work and will be completed at a later date* Remember to drag and click "play aloud" by your EDGE, CHROME or BRAVE browser            There has been a brief moment in time where the concept of justification has been pushed into question, not for its validity, or the premise... Though the ability for the "reasonable person" as courts implies has been varied into a subsection of conclusively uninhabitable grounds. The moderation of a person is part of the inclusivity of governance. That if you want to take the dog out of man... You have to beat it out of him with a stick, but when you nurture the inability to cope with weakness, with cope... And bad cope at that... An irrational conception of normality becomes exclusivity that becomes elitism. A gatekeeping promise that to accept a capacity to retain objectivity is to be weak .. A promise to the public t...