A Treatise on Families, Child Rearing and the Metaethics of Association

 

A Treatise on Families, Child Rearing and the Metaethics of Association

By Ph. Basil Coles

2026 - Privately Published

Remember to drag and click "read aloud" on your Brave, Chrome or EDGE browsers

An evaluation of the premises that impede growth in communities, the weak points in family structures and the fault of the individual by driving the intention to involve themselves in parent hood without a conscious negotiation as to the personal reach of their actions. In both the inclinations of their willingness to adapt as an individual to participate in society for their own and others benefit, the categorical threat that denying this imposes and the tangible side-effects of this, in-so-far as the willingness by other clinicians to acknowledge this has been syndicated as financiers conglomerated.

          What is a Family?

          The initial conceptions of families seems to be something of a mystery when the examinations of the practices, specific burial practices and even vague resemblances, still praciticed throughout the world in Indonesia, New-Guinea, Africa sporadically and most densely, South america. The premises of a functional social group requires many things, and when familial trust is developed through generational interbreeding with different cultural practices in close proximity, the survivalism of the family is best determined by their willingness to cooperate.

The food on the table, the trades for trade and the trades for the construction of the community are some first and foremost attributions of the historical family unit, often interconjoined though friendships and responsibilities, homosexuality and heterosexual practices left some variations between even how the perceptions of bordering friendships/romantic practices did stand, lacking a solid structure. While the lay-over of basic responsibilities was broadly shifted among those closest to that unit where the eventual trade-names mentality would become more common practice, special training and the narrative of "hours-to-burn" left the members of some communities that had better access to resources with a "monopoly" that could lead them to benefit, or danger.. If there were 100 people in a community, and there was a contingent of 40 males, and 60 females, the ability to quickly reproduce is something that would be easily achieved, but without the ability to sort out the infrastructure for those families possibly up to 10 members sexually involved, with the children separately accounted for means that too many pregnant women would be not busy with other tasks, the strength of fighting unit would also be diminished...

With south american cultures using the image of women historically to metaphorically embody the symbol of nature and the nest of creation, their protections historically were different than even now .. Because murder was defined back then (roughly) Leaving the initiations of conflict at different ends .. While the ability to manage these faculties was understood because the work necessary to accomplish day to day life was bound to the hands to complete it. The tribalism focus, developed totems, to identify the family units, through either direct or extended matters, where sometimes only 2 families would be a village, with as said 100 people in them .. And these totems to identify safe marriage, were beyond the understanding of even colonists that attempted to govern them... Did not apprehend the consideration for many customs that could have benefitted them historically, beyond even their own comprehension.

In the initial formations behind a strong community usually came with the consistency behind the roles each play in society, why should someone whom has no ambitions beyond starting a store, to sell meat they are not willing to slaughter, the meat to them may as well fall from the sky, but when they use electronic devices, they feel entitled to share values beyond their post, never with the goal to perform citations that allow for juxtaposed perspective of the ability fully follow through with even their own ideas... In many of these reaches, to make the considerations with where people view themselves and the means for others to view the, these means are respective to the wealth of knowledge they bring to children when they decide to procreate.

Thus, means to effective be a member of society are biased to the willingness to be a member of society, themselves in the first place... If they do not pursue mediocrity, then their children will often fall below mediocre. If the member was to decide to fill a gap in the societies access to goods, materials or a service they lack... They are intending to pull their weight, and if those means are safety, food reliability, or things that make for each to have the capacity to fulfil those needs themselves, the very reach of the member, is slowly drifting well under the standard status of "mediocre".